|
Attorney Amaro Lopes was admitted to the
practice of
law in Wisconsin on June IO. 2013,
State Bar No. 1091285.
On May 6, 2026, Lopez's license to practice
law in
Wisconsin was administratively
suspended for noncompliance with the 2024-
2025
Wisconsin mandatory continuing legal
education (CLE) requirements.
The Board of Bar Examiners (BBE) sent a
Notice of
Noncompliance for the 2024-2025
Reporting Cycle to Lopez, which notified him
that an
electronic filing of his CLE report and a
$100 late
fee must be submitted on or before May 5,
2026, or
his license to practice law in
Wisconsin would be suspended automatically on
May 6,
2026.
After receiving the Notice of Noncompliance,
Lopez
tJ1istakenly set the due date in his
calendar to submit the late foe and
electronic
filing of his CLE report as June l, 2026,
instead of
May 5, 2026.
On May 6, 2026, Lopez was made aware that his
license to practice law was suspended
when he received an email at 5:40 p.m. from
the
Wisconsin State Public Defender's Assigned
Counsel Division.
On May 7, 2026, Lopez engaged in the practice
of law
while suspended by appearing in
circuit court on two separate cases. Lopez
also
filed a Notice of Appointment and Demand for
Discovery in a case and a Notice of
Completion in
another case. In each of his court
appearances,
Lopez admitted that he did not inform the
court nor
opposing counsel that his license to practice
law had been suspended because he expected to
be
able to reinstate his license fairly rapidly
and
did not want to negatively impact his
client's
representation.
On May 8, 2026, Lopez paid his late fee to
the BBE
and signed a Petition for Reinstatement,
which was
received by the BBE on May 11, 2026.
On May 11, 2026, Lopez engaged in the
practice of
law while suspended by appearing in
circuit court for a plea/sentencing hearing
in two
separate cases. In each of his court
appearances,
Lopez admitted that he did not inform the
court nor
opposing counsel that his license to practice
law had been suspended because he already
filed his
petition for reinstatement with the BBE and
expected to have his license reinstated al
any
moment without negatively impacting his
client's
representation.
During his court appearances on May 7, 2026,
and May
11, 2026, Lopez made the
intentional decision to knowingly conceal
from the
court and opposing counsel that his license
was
suspended.
On May 15, 226, the BBE reinstated Lopez's
license
to practice law in Wisconsin.
By practicing law in Wisconsin during a time
period
when his license to practice law was
suspended, Attorney Lopez violated SCR
31.10(1),
which states, "(1) If a lawyer fails to
comply
with the attendance requirement of SCR 31.02,
fails
to comply with the reporting requirement of
SCR 31.03(1), or fails to pay the late fee
under SCR
31.03(2), the board shall serve a notice of
noncompliance on the lawyer. This notice
shall
advise the lawyer that the lawyer's state bar
membership shall be automatically suspended
for
failing to file evidence of compliance or to
pay
the late fee within 60 days after service of
the
notice. The board shall certify the names of
all
lawyers so suspended under this rule to the
clerk of
the supreme court, all supreme court
justices,
all court of appeals and circuit court
judges, all
circuit court commissioners appointed under
SCR
75.02(1) in this state, all circuit court
clerks,
all juvenile court clerks, all registers in
probate,
the executive director of the state bar of
Wisconsin, the Wisconsin State Public
Defender's
Office, and the clerks of the federal
district
courts in Wisconsin. A lawyer shall not
engage in
the practice
of law in Wisconsin while his or her state
bar
membership is suspended under this rule."
Violations
of SCR 31.10(1) are enforced under the Rules
of
Professional Conduct via SCR 20:8.4(f), which
states, "It is professional misconduct for a
lawyer
to ... violate a statute, supreme court rule,
supreme
court order or supreme court decision
regulating the
conduct of lawyers."
By appearing in court on behalf of his
clients when
he knew his license to practice law in
Wisconsin was
suspended and then making the intentional
decision
to conceal from the court and
opposing counsel that his license was
suspended,
Attorney Lopez violated SCR 20:8.4(c), which
states, "It is professional misconduct for a
lawyer
to: ... (c) engage in conduct involving
dishonesty,
fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.
Attorney Lopez has no prior discipline.
In accordance with SCR 22.09(3), Attorney
Amaro
Lopez is hereby publicly reprimanded.
Dated this 24th day of September, 2026.
|
|