|
SCR 22.22(3) provides that this court shall
impose the identical discipline or license
suspension unless the procedure in the
other jurisdiction was so lacking in notice
or opportunity to be heard as to constitute
a due process violation; there was such an
infirmity of proof establishing the
misconduct that this court should not
accept as final the misconduct finding; or
the misconduct justifies substantially
different discipline here. Neither the OLR
nor Attorney Van Liew contend, nor does
this court find, that any of these three
exceptions exist.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the license of Steven W.
Van Liew to practice law in the State of
Wisconsin be suspended for 90 days,
effective July 25, 2006;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Attorney Van
Liew shall comply, if he has not already
done so, with the requirements of SCR 22.26
pertaining to activities following
suspension.
|