|
¶1 PER CURIAM. We review the
stipulation filed by Kristin J. Gernetzke
and the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR)
pursuant to SCR 22.12, wherein Attorney
Gernetzke admits to the facts and
misconduct alleged by the OLR as set forth
in the parties' stipulation. The
misconduct giving rise to this disciplinary
matter involved improper and undocumented
billings that Attorney Gernetzke submitted
to the Office of the State Public Defender
(SPD).
¶2 We adopt the stipulated facts and
conclusions of law. We agree that Attorney
Gernetzke's misconduct warrants suspension
of her license to practice law for a period
of six months, and we further agree that
restitution is appropriate as discussed
herein. The parties do not seek to impose
the costs of this proceeding upon Attorney
Gernetzke and we accede to that
recommendation.
¶3 Attorney Gernetzke was admitted to
practice law in Wisconsin in 2002. She has
no previous disciplinary history.
¶4 From September 2002 until May 7,
2005, Attorney Gernetzke was an associate
attorney with the offices of Skemp &
Associates in La Crosse. From May 7, 2005,
until her termination on October 20, 2005,
she was an associate attorney with the firm
of O'Flaherty, Heim & Egan, Ltd.,
("O'Flaherty firm") also in La Crosse.
Throughout this period, Attorney Gernetzke
was certified to work as a public defender
by the SPD and undertook a number of cases
in that capacity.
¶5 While practicing with Skemp &
Associates, Attorney Gernetzke began to
utilize a billing entry described
as "develop legal theory" on bills she
submitted to the SPD. This type of entry
requires certain documentation in the file
to be acceptable. Attorney Gernetzke,
however, submitted numerous billings under
the category "develop legal theory" without
creating proper documentation. In some
cases, no work had been done on the file or
the entries were made as a result of
Attorney Gernetzke "thinking" about the
case. Eventually, the O'Flaherty firm
terminated Attorney Gernetzke's employment
because of her use of the "develop legal
theory" entries on bills submitted to the
SPD, and filed a grievance with the OLR.
¶6 The OLR investigators reviewed 26
of the files Attorney Gernetzke worked on
for the SPD and determined that Attorney
Gernetzke was paid $5120 for time described
as "develop legal theory." Additional
billings totaling $2698 submitted under
this category were pending at the time of
the OLR investigation. The SPD conducted
an additional review of its files and
independently demanded Attorney Gernetzke
return additional monies paid to her for
billing entries designated as "develop
legal theory."
|