|
ATTORNEY reinstatement
proceeding. Reinstatement granted.
¶1 PER CURIAM. We review a referee's
report recommending that Mark E. Robinson's
license to practice law in Wisconsin be
reinstated. The Office of Lawyer
Regulation (OLR) and the Board of Bar
Examiners (BBE) have both joined in that
favorable recommendation.
¶2 We adopt the referee's findings of
fact and conclusions of law and conclude
that Attorney Robinson's license to
practice law should be reinstated. We
further direct Attorney Robinson to pay the
costs of the reinstatement proceeding,
which total $4151.02 as of September 7,
2006.
|
|
¶3 Attorney Robinson was admitted to
practice law in Wisconsin in 1991. On June
24, 2005, this court suspended his license
to practice law, effective August 6, 2005,
for six months for professional misconduct
consisting of engaging in conduct involving
dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or
misrepresentation; representing a client
where the representation may be materially
limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to
another client or to a third person, or by
the lawyer's own interests; violating or
attempting to violate the Rules of
Professional Conduct or knowingly assisting
or inducing another to do so; and
communicating about the subject of the
representation of a client with a party the
lawyer knows to be represented by another
lawyer, without the consent of the other
lawyer. See In re Disciplinary
Proceedings Against Robinson, 2005 WI 88,
282 Wis. 2d 216, 700 N.W.2d 757.
|
|
¶4 Attorney Robinson now seeks
reinstatement of his license to practice
law in Wisconsin. John R. Decker was
appointed referee in the matter and
conducted a formal hearing on the
reinstatement petition. The referee filed
his report and recommendation on August 18,
2006. As noted above, the OLR and the BBE
have both joined in that favorable
recommendation.
|
|
¶5 SCR 22.31(1) provides the standard
to be met for reinstatement of a law
license. The petitioner has the burden of
demonstrating "by clear, satisfactory, and
convincing evidence" that the lawyer has
the moral character to practice law, that
the lawyer's resumption of the practice of
law will not be detrimental to the
administration of justice or subversive of
the public interest, and that the lawyer
has complied with SCR 22.26 and the terms
of the suspension. In addition, SCR 22.29
(4) sets forth related requirements that a
petition for reinstatement must show. All
of these additional requirements are
effectively incorporated into SCR 22.31(1).
¶6 The referee in this case concluded
that Attorney Robinson had met all of the
criteria for reinstatement and that he had
met his burden of demonstrating that his
license to practice law in Wisconsin should
be reinstated. The referee specifically
found that Attorney Robinson has fully
acknowledged his misconduct.
¶7 After review of the record we agree
that Attorney Robinson has established by
clear, satisfactory, and convincing
evidence that he has satisfied all the
criteria necessary for reinstatement.
Accordingly, we adopt the referee's
findings of fact and conclusions of law and
we accept the referee's recommendation to
reinstate Attorney Robinson's license to
practice law in Wisconsin. We further
direct Attorney Robinson to pay the costs
of the reinstatement proceeding.
¶8 IT IS ORDERED that the petition for
reinstatement of the license of Mark E.
Robinson to practice law in Wisconsin is
granted, effective the date of this order.
¶9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within
six months of the date of this order Mark
E. Robinson pay to the Office of Lawyer
Regulation the costs of this proceeding.
If the costs are not paid within the time
specified, and absent a showing to this
court of his inability to pay the costs
within that time, the license of Mark E.
Robinson to practice law in Wisconsin shall
be suspended until further order of the
court.
|